Home > Agile, Development > Technical Retrospective (Part 2)

Technical Retrospective (Part 2)

October 3rd, 2007 Scott Lilly

Here are the items we came up with during our technical retrospective. Since this was our first agile project, there were a lot of … well … areas for improvement. I’ll go into more detail on how we plan on implementing changes based on the retrospective in future posts.

DO MORE

  • Use generic names for namespaces (instead of company/project names)
  • Evaluate newer technologies (2.0/3.0 framework, SQL Server 2005, VS 2005, etc.)
  • Better use of Model-View-Presenter pattern
  • Investigate LINQ
  • Make sure stories/unit tests are driven from the UI to DB, not the DB to UI
  • Load testing from the beginning
  • External web server for testing
  • Meet with Compliance team earlier in the process
  • Spread deployment package knowledge (and all other knowledge) through the team
  • Use typed collections
  • Communicate/pushback with System Analysts/Product Specialists for features that are high-maintenance and difficult to maintain
  • Develop proof of concepts
  • UI test tool (Selenium or alternative)
  • Let System Analysts know what tests can be automated
  • Build DB from scratch (by scripts)
  • Better definition of purposes of unit/integration/regression tests
  • Designated time for refactoring
  • Write tests first (we have 96% code coverage, but some tests were written after the code was written)
  • Follow standard XP as baseline
  • Experiment w/pair programming in ‘non-stuck’ situations
  • Simplify environment setup
  • Robust POST (Power On Self-Test)
  • Protected/private/etc., instead of public (when possible)
  • Keep development simple/clear/understandable

DO LESS

  • Use company/app names in namespaces/classes
  • Coding before stories exist
  • Client-side scripting
  • Frames
  • Unit tests with external dependencies
  • One-line methods (or very little code within the method)
  • Custom exception class (use it, or lose it)
Categories: Agile, Development Tags:
Comments are closed.